Talk:260,722 MHz

From Signal Identification Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

The lack of any visible frequency hopping in the waterfall plot suggests a few possibilities:

  • The signal is not actually using FHSS, or the hopping is happening at a speed or resolution not captured in the displayed segment of the waterfall plot.
  • There may be a longer hop time or pattern that is not evident within the short time slice shown. FHSS signals often hop across a wider bandwidth and would display multiple peaks if the hops occurred within the span of the displayed timeframe.

The description "Continuous signal with FHSS 'Waterdroplets'" might suggest that the signal does exhibit frequency hopping when observed over a longer period or with more sensitive equipment capable of capturing the hopping pattern.




without further details on the time scale or resolution of the waterfall plot, it is difficult to provide a definitive analysis. However, the image does not show any obvious signs of FHSS within the captured timeframe and spectral resolution. The consistent nature of the signal could suggest a number of possibilities such as a fixed-frequency beacon, telemetry, or a control channel.

--Moistifarius (talk) 08:29, 9 November 2023 (NZDT)